Multistate Bar Examination (MBE) Practice Questions

Hundreds of practice questions mapped to all tested subjects on the Multistate Bar Examination. Questions include worked explanations with full solution steps.

Every question is stress-tested before it reaches you — competing AI systems hypothesize, challenge, and validate each item through a multi-stage pipeline before anything is published.

Start practicing — free

Sample Questions

Select an answer to check yourself. Sign up to access the full bank with worked solutions.

Question 1 of 3

A California resident sued a Nevada corporation in California state court for breach of contract seeking $100,000. The defendant removed to federal court based on diversity jurisdiction. The corporation's principal place of business is in California. The plaintiff moves to remand. The court should:

A Deny remand because the defendant is a Nevada citizen and the amount exceeds $75,000
B Remand because a corporation is a citizen of both its state of incorporation and its principal place of business
C Deny remand because federal courts have original jurisdiction over all cases between citizens of different states
D Remand because the claim arises under state law and lacks any federal question
Question 2 of 3

A California resident sued a Nevada corporation and its CEO (a California resident) in state court for $80,000 in contract damages. The corporation removed based on diversity, arguing the CEO was fraudulently joined. The corporation's principal place of business is in California. The court should:

A Remand because complete diversity is lacking between the plaintiff and the non-diverse CEO
B Deny remand because the amount exceeds $75,000 and the non-diverse defendant was fraudulently joined
C Deny remand because the contract's partial performance in Nevada creates a federal question
D Deny remand because the CEO's citizenship should be disregarded as he acted in corporate capacity
Question 3 of 3

A New York plaintiff filed a federal diversity action against a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in New York, seeking $90,000. The defendant moves to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The court should:

A Deny the motion because the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000
B Grant the motion because complete diversity is lacking
C Deny the motion because the defendant is incorporated in Delaware
D Grant the motion because the plaintiff chose federal court rather than state court

Those were just samples. Sign up to access hundreds more with full worked solutions.

Continue practicing — free

Ready to try PassExams?

Free tier gets you daily practice questions. Upgrade when you want the full bank and AI study tools.

Create a free account

No credit card required

10% of our revenue funds free and discounted access for those who need it most.